Thus, the opening area is adjusted automatically to keep the flow of the
intake air at constant velocity in the venturi. Consequently, the venturi opening is optimum for any engine operating conditions.
The idea of SU's is to provide a combination of performance WITH DRIVEABILITY. Rather than snap the throttles wide open, resulting in a rapid loss in velocity of air flowing through the carbs (as in webers), they only allow as much air to enter the engine as it can handle.
It is my understanding that the accelerator pump mechanism on a weber is an attempt to overcome this problem that doesn't exist in an SU, rather than an advantage over the SU's
Isn't the rapid rising what we want?
Not really, as air velocity is way down until the engine reaches higher RPM. You don't want extra ar / fuel until the engine can handle all this extra air and fuel.
In effect, the SU's design offers a vaiable venturi. Hence, you don't have to worry about whether a 40 or 45 is better
, as it varies between virtually nothing and 38mm for the Hitachi-SU's.
no needle = make your own = good luck
Fair point, but if you have the ability to make the needles (ie have a lathe or have access to someone with one), this could be seen as an advantage. You can make your own custom needles to get the mixture right all across the rev range. My SU's have custom needles, and the difference is amazing.
Just my understanding of how the two different carbs work, I stand to be corrected
It should also be noted that I don't claim SU's to be better than webbers, just different. Probably more driveable on a slightly tuned car, but the webbers will undoubtedly offer better performance ON A CAR THAT CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEM (ie more highly modified).
p.s. as much as I like SU's
, I will be fitting 44mm Solex carbs to my next engine (opens new can of worms)