Ozdat Home Feature Cars Ozdat Classifieds Event Calander Links Trade Link Tech Resource Merchandise Donate Web Mail
It is currently Sun Jun 16, 2024 9:35 am

All times are UTC+11:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 6:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:50 am
Posts: 1423
Location: ACT
well I wrote a long desciptive post and then ie crashed and I lost it :( So here is the abridged version.

What do people recommend as a toe setting for the front of my 1600 that has about -2.5deg camber and +3.5deg caster, standard but lowered (fkd camber and caster) rear end, swaybars, locker and full slicks. Will be a track only alignment so not concerned too much with tyre wear.
cheers

[ img ]


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:16 am
Posts: 269
Location: Mount Eliza, Victoria
This article has been around for years. Give some suggestions on alignment.

http://www.whiteline.com.au/images/arti ... _38(a).jpg
http://www.whiteline.com.au/images/arti ... _38(b).jpg

It suggests zero toe.

I have used these settings on my track car and it works well for me.....

_________________
Race car 13B 1600 - since SOLD!
'13 M135i, Quaife LSD, tuned (380 hp)
'15 X5 xDrive 30d tow car
'02 Porsche 996 GT2 (600hp/480rw hp)


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:50 am
Posts: 1423
Location: ACT
interesting read, would I be right is thinking that that front alignment would have to be done with the rear alignment in mind? ie. the settings suggested there for the front would not be optimal on my car where rear toe-out and camber are more extreme?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:50 am
Posts: 1423
Location: ACT
ok so I took it to wheel aligner and said what I wanted it to do, these are the results:

Front-
toe: -0.8mm
camber: -3deg
caster: LH+5.9deg, RH+5.1deg

Rear-
toe: -1.9mm
camber: -2.8deg


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 6:25 pm
Posts: 129
Location: melbourne.vic.au
Tyrie wrote:
ok so I took it to wheel aligner and said what I wanted it to do, these are the results:

Front-
toe: -0.8mm
camber: -3deg
caster: LH+5.9deg, RH+5.1deg

Rear-
toe: -1.9mm
camber: -2.8deg
That's a fair whack of castor. I tried 6.3* on my track car but had to back it off to just under 5* to avoid castor wobble under braking. Should be good if it works on your car though :thumbsup:

_________________
Track car: 1970 1600 Sedan, L18
Gravel car: 1981 Bluebird Wagon, L20B


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:50 am
Posts: 1423
Location: ACT
mikan_orange wrote:
Tyrie wrote:
ok so I took it to wheel aligner and said what I wanted it to do, these are the results:

Front-
toe: -0.8mm
camber: -3deg
caster: LH+5.9deg, RH+5.1deg

Rear-
toe: -1.9mm
camber: -2.8deg
That's a fair whack of castor. I tried 6.3* on my track car but had to back it off to just under 5* to avoid castor wobble under braking. Should be good if it works on your car though :thumbsup:
I'm so glad you said that! I think I have experienced this caster wobble, thought the car was gonna fall apart :? It has only happened twice and I have not been able to identify why it happened those times and not all the time. Any ideas?


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 6:25 pm
Posts: 129
Location: melbourne.vic.au
Tyrie wrote:
mikan_orange wrote:
Tyrie wrote:
ok so I took it to wheel aligner and said what I wanted it to do, these are the results:

Front-
toe: -0.8mm
camber: -3deg
caster: LH+5.9deg, RH+5.1deg

Rear-
toe: -1.9mm
camber: -2.8deg
That's a fair whack of castor. I tried 6.3* on my track car but had to back it off to just under 5* to avoid castor wobble under braking. Should be good if it works on your car though :thumbsup:
I'm so glad you said that! I think I have experienced this caster wobble, thought the car was gonna fall apart :? It has only happened twice and I have not been able to identify why it happened those times and not all the time. Any ideas?
It usually happened to me under light braking or when getting off the brakes, and sometimes a small bump at low speed was enough to start it. Hitting a small bump under braking was guaranteed to set it off. It's a resonant oscillation of the suspension & steering with many inter-related causes like ball joint & suspension bush slop, tie rod & drag link stiffness & probably steering box slop too. A common fix on jacked up 4x4's that suffer from it is to fit a steering damper. I didn't try to fix it, just backed off the castor & increased the camber instead :oops:

_________________
Track car: 1970 1600 Sedan, L18
Gravel car: 1981 Bluebird Wagon, L20B


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 1:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:36 pm
Posts: 496
Location: Gosnells, WA
2.8degs neg on the rear seems like a lot ?
I'm planning on aiming for 0deg's or near enough at ride height as the old racecar always had problems hooking up from the start and just wanted to bag it up. The suspension gains camber pretty quickly on bump, so figured 0deg initial would be OK.
Would be interested to hear what other people reckon ?

The toe for both ends and the camber for the front seems to be on the money for the other numbers I've seen kickin' around.

_________________
Happiness is watching the race.... in your rearview mirror


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:50 am
Posts: 1423
Location: ACT
rear camber is because it is quite low (I think 35mm lower than the whiteline article recommends) and has no adjustment. I will endeavor to obtain a datsport arc one day.


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:11 am 
Offline
Donating Member
Donating Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 1:45 pm
Posts: 3200
Location: Newcastle, NSW
I run around 4.5 degrees neg camber on the front, 3.5 caster and zero toe. Any more caster and I would have had to modify / cut the front guard as the tyre would foul it on the front , bottom corner of the guard (ie towards the front apron area).

Rear is 1.5 neg camber - acheived, like you, just by lowering as mine isn't adjustable either. I can't recall the toe setting for the rear.

Mine handles fairly well (I think so anyway) - does Wakefield in 1:20 with only 50kW, and datalogging at a few circuits shows I don't lack any corner speed compared to other (faster) cars. Only current issue I have is a tendency for the rear to break away quite suddenly, which I feel is due to the addition of a rear swaybar not long ago. This improved an understeer problem I had, but it doesn't seem as "controllable" at the limit (once the rear breaks away, it does so very quickly and is difficult to catch, previously it was more manageable).

_________________
1970 ex Group A Rally P510
1971 P510
1972 180B SSS
1965 SP310 Fairlady
1966 SP311 Fairlady


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 2:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:50 am
Posts: 1423
Location: ACT
haha yeh you can see in the pic I posted I have removed that pesky piece of front guard on mine. I have a rear swaybar fitted but I guess its an easy job to disconnect the links to compare with and without. I have softish rear springs (ie not datsport 1100lb jobs) so I figured a rear bar wouldnt go astray.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:43 pm
Posts: 223
Location: ADELAIDE
front toe should be at zero or up to 4mm total toe out depending on how turn in feels

_________________
Jason
1600 Historic Touring Car


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 1:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 9:50 am
Posts: 1423
Location: ACT
just got another alignment (specifically saying I wanted it to handle at wakefield) and they gave it 1.5mm toe in, is it going to be sh*t?


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:43 pm
Posts: 223
Location: ADELAIDE
Probably wont turn in very well.

When getting an alignment you should be telling them what you want not leaving it to them (when it comes to a track car anyway ).

_________________
Jason
1600 Historic Touring Car


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 11:16 pm 
Offline
Guru
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 10:09 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Lonsdale, South Australia
1.9 toe in on the rear with -2.8 camber seems suss for a std rear.
what was the thrust angle?

_________________
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
www.datsport.com

"R.I.P. Baz. 29 April 2022. Thank you for all your contributions to the Datsun community over the years. You will be missed." - OZDAT


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »

All times are UTC+11:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to: 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited